Abstract：Based on the statistics collected from 2000 to 2011 on the section of Book Reviews and Book Recommendation Column of the Collection of Women's Studies, this paper recognizes that these two sections have grown though there is room for improvement in areas of the originality of reviews, close interactions among readers, potential writers, and the editorial department and improvement of collaboration institutionally in publishing the journal. The paper recommends strengthening reviews of more representative books and pictures and at the same time, building stronger relationship among readers, and potential writers and making book and picture reviews more effective.
宓瑞新. 对《妇女研究论丛》杂志图书评介栏目的思考*——以2000-2011年的数据为例[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2012, 0(5): 99-104.
MI Rui-xin. Reflections on the Book Review Columns of the Collection of Women's Studies. , 2012, 0(5): 99-104.
[1]孙歌.我们的书评观[J].中国图书评论,2008-01-15. [2]蔡美彪.学术性书评的要求[J].近代史研究,1999,(1). [3]舒建华.纽约时报的书评[N].深圳商报,2002-06-09. [4]罗仁助.对美国书评报刊之初步研究[J].图书馆论坛,1993,(6). [5]王蕾.美国的书评宣传[J]. 江苏图书馆学报，2002,(1). [6]董鼎山.美国的书评编辑怎样工作[J].读书,1982,(8). [7]Claire Dwyer. Book Reviews in Gender, Place and Culture: Some Analysis and Reflections[J]. Gender, Place and Culture, 2008,15(1). [8]宓瑞新.从本土到国际——以《澳大利亚女性主义研究》杂志为个案[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2010,37(3). [9]史凯亮,宓瑞新.集思广益 共同推动中国妇女/性别研究创新发展——《妇女研究论丛》百期纪念座谈会纪实[J].妇女研究论丛,2010,(4).
2012, Vol. 0 
