Abstract：John Rawls's theory of justice often gives people the impression of a universal doctrine. Feminism criticizes John Rawls's theory of justice at the level of its reasoning, its basic ideas and its scope of application. Feminism thinks that John Rawls's universalism is a false universalism, in which gender justice is missing. The source of gender justice being missing is the existence of dichotomy between public sphere and private sphere. In order to achieve gender justice, we must overcome this dichotomy.
[1] 郭夏娟.为正义而辩：女性主义与罗尔斯[M].北京:人民出版社,2004. [2] [美]卡罗尔·帕特曼著,李朝晖译.性契约[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2004. [3] [美]约翰·罗尔斯著,何怀宏等译.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988. [4] Ruth Anna Putnam. Why Not a Feminist Theory of Justice?[A]. in Martha C.Nussnaum and Jonathan Glover eds.. Women, Culture and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities[C]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. [5] Susan Moller Okin. Justice and Gender[J]. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1987,16(1). [6] Green, Karen. Rawls, Women and the Priority of Liberty[J]. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 1986, 64(1). [7] [美]约翰·罗尔斯著 ,姚大志译.作为公平的正义——正义新论[M].上海:上海三联书店,2002. [8] Martha Nussbaum. Justice for the Excluded of the World: Capabilities across National Boundaries[A]. in Tanner Lectures in Human Values[C]. Lecture 2., Australian National University, Canberra, November 12-14, 2002. [9] 苏珊·奥金.正义与性别[A].[美]詹姆斯·P·斯特巴主编,程炼等译.实践中的道德[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2006. [10] [加]巴巴拉·阿内尔著 ,郭夏娟译.政治学与女性主义[M].北京:东方出版社,2005. [11] [英]洛克著,瞿菊农等译.政府论(上篇)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982. [12] Marilyn Friedman. Beyond Caring: The De-moralization of Gender[J]. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1987, 13(supplementary). [13] [英]露丝·里斯特著,夏宏译.公民身份：女性主义的视角[M].长春:吉林出版集团有限责任公司,2010. [14] [美]卡罗尔·吉利根著,肖巍译.不同的声音——心理学理论与妇女发展[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1999. [15] [英]玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特著,王瑛译.女权辩护[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2006. [16] 瓦勒里·布赖森著.女权主义政治理论引论[A].李银河主编.妇女：最漫长的革命[C],北京:中国妇女出版社,2007. [17] [英]约翰·麦克因斯著,黄菡等译.男性的终结[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002. [18] [美]内尔·诺丁斯著,侯晶晶译.始于家庭：关怀与社会政策[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2006. [19] 玛里琳·弗里德曼著.伦理学中的女性主义——自主性的概念[A].[英]米兰达·弗里克等编,肖巍等译.女性主义哲学指南[C].北京:北京大学出版社,2010. [20] Owen Flanagan and Kathryn Jackson. Justice, Care, and Gender: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate Revisited[J]. Ethics, 1987,(3).
2012, Vol. 0 
