Abstract：This paper examines the changes in the logic of contemporary western feminist philosophy and its inherent impasse and reveals a tendency to replace political economy critique with cultural critique. Using the dialectic unity of class and gender in historical materialism to analysis gender justice and women's liberation, the paper explores tentatively the direction in which Chinese feminist philosophical research develops in the future.
[1]Diemut Bubeck. Feminism in Political Philosophy: Women’s Difference [A]. in Miranda Fricker and Jennifer Hornsby (ed.). Feminism in Phillosophy[C]. Cambridge University Press, 2000. [2]Teresa L. Ebert. Ludic Feminism, the Body, Performance, and Labor: Bringing "Materialism" Back into Feminist Cultural Studies[J]. Cultural Critique, 1992, (23). [3]Nancy Hartsock. Money, Sex and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism[M].Boston:Northeastern UP, 1985. [4] Heidi I. Hartmann. The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union[A]. Lydia Sargent (ed.). Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism[C]. Boston: South End Press, 1981. [5]王宏维.论西方马克思主义在社会性别视域中的演进与拓展[J].马克思主义研究,2006,(8). [6] Juliet Mitchell. Woman’s Estate[M]. New York: Vintage Books,1971. [7]马克思恩格斯全集(第4 卷)[C].北京:人民出版社,1975. [8] Bruce Braun. Review: A Politics of Possibility without the Possibility of Politics? Thoughts on Harvey's Troubles with Difference[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1998,88(4). [9]Mike Cole. A Marxist Critique of Claims for Postmodernism and Poststructuralism as Forces for Social Change and Social Justice[J]. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2003,24(4). [10][美]罗斯玛丽·帕特南·童.女性主义思潮导论[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2002.
2014, Vol. 0 
