主观规范对生育性别选择行为倾向的影响：基于TRA模型及中国农村社会关系结构的解释*

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (1064 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Using the TRA model and the data from the surveys conducted in three counties of Shaanxi province, this study analyzes the impacts of the subjective norms held by members of the structures of social ties in rural China on individual member's sex-selective intentions during pregnancy. The results indicate that the TRA model proves effective in explaining individual's sex-selective intention based on preference for son in areas where the son preference practice is strong. Whether adopting the sex-selective behavior based on son preference during pregnancy is, firstly, determined by the individual's own son preference attitudes. The subjective norms of the members who belong to the social ties structure have the significant impacts on parents' sex-selective intention based on son preference during pregnancy. However, secondly, the final decision on adopting sex-selective behavior based on son preference during pregnancy is an outcome of competition between blood ties versus marital ties, and strong versus weak social ties.

Key words： subjective norms sex-selective intention during pregnancy TRA social ties structure rural China

C924.24

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Xue-yan
	Gillian Einstein

Cite this article:

YANG Xue-yan,Gillian Einstein. The Impact of Subjective Norms on the Sex-selective Intention during Pregnancy: A Study Based on TRA Model and Social Ties Structure in Rural China[J]. , 2012, 0(5): 5-16.

URL:

https://www.fnyjlc.com/EN/ OR https://www.fnyjlc.com/EN/Y2012/V0/I5/5

[1]Das Gupta, M., Jiang, Z. and Li, B. et al.. Why is Son Preference so Persistent in East and South Asia? A Cross-Country Study of China, India and the Republic of Korea [J]. The Journal of Development Studies, 2003, (2).
[2]姜全保,李树茁,费尔德曼.20世纪中国“失踪女性”数量的估计[J].中国人口科学,2005,(8).
[3]Guilmoto, C., Z.. The Sex Ratio Transition in Asia[J]. Population Development Review, 2009, 35(3).
[4]中国国家统计局.2009年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/t20100225_ 402622945.htm, 2010-02-25/2010-09-25.
[5]乔晓春.性别偏好、性别选择与出生性别比[J].中国人口科学,2004,(1).
[6]石人炳,江丽娜.性别偏好与性别选择性生育技术利用意愿[J].人口学刊,2011,182(1).
[7]楚军红.中国农村产前性别选择的决定因素分析[J].中国人口科学,2001,(1).
[8]刘中一,潘绥铭.从男孩偏好到出生性别选择[J].市场与人口分析,2005,11(4).
[9]邓大才.农民生育偏好与行为：社会解构模型——对当今部分农民生育偏好及行为逆变的一个解释[J].社会科学研究,2008,(5).
[10]唐贵忠.农村计划生育的困境与对策[J].人口研究,1991,(1).
[11]朱秀杰.相对效用、男孩偏好与生育性别选择[J].南方人口,2010,25(1).
[12]吕红平,孙平.论家族文化对当代生育观念的影响[J].河北大学成人教育学院学报,2002,(2).
[13]魏亚萍.我国农民生育行为的社会结构解释[J].北京工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(2).
[14]刘中一.场域、惯习与农民生育行为:布迪厄实践理论视角下农民生育行为[J].社会,2005,(6).
[15]Li, J. H. & Lavely, W.. Village Conext, Women’s Status, and Son Preference among Rural Chinese Women[J]. Rural Sociology, 2003, 68(1).
[16]刘爽.对中国生育“男孩偏好”社会动因的再思考[J].人口研究,2006,30(3).
[17]Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I.. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research [R]. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.1975.
[18]Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M.. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
[19]李树茁,朱楚珠.中国儿童生存性别差异的研究与实践[C].北京:中国人口出版社,2001.
[20]国家关爱女孩行动办公室专家组.中国的关爱女孩行动[C].北京:中国人口出版社,2008.
[21]费孝通.乡土中国[C].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[22]费孝通.生育制度[C].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
[23]Bian, Y. J.. Bringing Strong Ties Back In: Indirect Connection, Bridge and Job Search in China [J]. American Sociological Review, 1997.
[24]许璟莹.社会网络关系强度与中国城市适育年龄居民生育意愿[Z].复旦大学社会学硕士论文,2010.
[25]伍海霞,李树茁.社会网络对农民工生育观念的影响——来自深圳的调查发现[J].人口与发展, 2008,14(6).
[26]Ajzen, I.. The Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, (50).
[27]Werner, P.. Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior[A]. in S.J. Peterson & T.S. Bredow (eds). Middle Range Theories: Application to Nursing Research[C]. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.
[28]莫丽霞.当前我国农村居民的生育意愿与性别偏好研究[J].人口研究,2005,29(2).
[29]池慧灵，张桂蓉.从“男性偏好”到“儿女双全”的社会学分析[J].湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版),2006,28(6).
[30]Choi, Kui-Son, & Cho, Woo-Hyun et al.. The Relationships among Quality, Value, Satisfaction and Behavioral Intention in Health Care Provider Choice: A South Korean Study[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, (57).
[31]Cordel, Victor V., Wongtada, Nittaya & Kieschnick, Jr. Robert L.. Counterfeit Purchase Intentions: Role of Lawfulness Attitudes and Product Traits as Determinants[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1996, (35).
[32]Jeonga, Miyoung & Lambertb, Carolyn U.. Adaptation of an Information Quality Framework to Measure Customers’ Behavioral Intentions to Use Lodging Web Sites[J]. Hospitality Management, 2001, (20).
[33]杨善华,侯红蕊.血缘、姻缘、亲情与利益[J].宁夏社会科学,1999,(6).
[34]张国庆.现阶段中国农村血缘与姻缘博弈现象探析[J].许昌学院学报,2003,(4).
[35]杨华.湘南宗族性村落姻亲关系状况调查[EB/OL].http://www.sociology.cass.cn/shxw/xcyj/t20061231_10363.htm，[2006/12/31, 2011/05/01].
[36]杨雪燕,李树茁,龚怡.经济增长、社会发展与男孩偏好：基于治理的视角[J].妇女研究论丛,2010,(6).