以高校女教师为例论女性研究的日常生活转向*

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (1050 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Existing literature on female college/university teachers mainly adopts gender role theory, looking at role conflicts and obstacles to women's career development. Such discussion opens up a way for female teachers' experiences to be subsumed in men's voices and at the same time, reinforces the stereotypical gender images and problematizes women's lived experience especially in marriage and family. This paper reflects upon the existing analytical perspectives of women teachers' lives based on an empirical research on female college/university teachers. It argues that a theoretical framework focusing on the everyday life and practices of women teachers is important for us, not only to better understand women teachers' lived experience from their own standpoint, but also to see how women struggle against many social impositions using their own body and knowledge.

Key words： female college/university teachers everyday life feminism

PACS:

C913 .68

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DING Yu

Cite this article:

DING Yu. Everyday Life as a New Theoretical Framework in Women's Studies-Using Female College/university Teachers as an Example[J]. , 2014, 0(3): 55-64.

URL:

https://www.fnyjlc.com/EN/ OR https://www.fnyjlc.com/EN/Y2014/V0/I3/55

[1]Knights D. and D. Kerfoot. Editorial: Breaking Boundaries: Women in Academia[J]. Gender, Work and Organization, 2008,15(3): 231-234.
[2]Lane K. A., J. X. Goh and E. Driver-Linn. Implicit Science Stereotypes Mediate the Relationship between Gender and Academic Participation[J]. Sex Roles, 2012, 66 (3-4): 220-234.
[3]蔡学军,范巍等. 中国博士发展状况[M]. 北京：北京大学出版社,2011.
[4]Kinoti, K. and S. Mudaliar. The Pitfalls of Monitoring and Evaluation: Do Current Frameworks Really Serve Us? Association for Women's Rights in Development[J/OL]. 2009-04-12, http: //www.awid.org/Library/The-pitfalls-of-monitoring-and-evaluation-Do-current- frameworks-really-serve-us.
[5]刘卫萍,钱旅扬. 高校女教师心理健康问题分析[J]. 实用全科医学, 2006, 4 (2).
[6]赵艳丽. 高校女教师心理健康状况调查研究[J]. 中华女子学院学报, 2006, 18 (4).
[7]田淑梅,裘杰,刘波平. 高校女教师职业心理素质结构探析[J]. 教育探索, 2006, (3).
[8]陈小普. 高校女教师心理枯竭分析[J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2007, 158 (6).
[9]裔昭印. 我国高校女知识分子性别观念研究[J]. 上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2003, 32 (1).
[10]苏莉. 论学校教育视域里的性别文化建构[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004, 127 (4).
[11]张河川等. 高校女教师婚姻质量与心理社会因素[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2002, 16 (8).
[12]张敏. 高校女教师职业倦怠成因及对策[J]. 攀枝花学院学报,2011,28 (2).
[13]Da, W. W.. A Regional Tradition of Gender Equity: Shanghai Men in Sydney, Australia[J]. The Journal of Men's Studies, 2004, 12 (2): 133-149.
[14]Morrison, A. M., and M. A. Von Glinow. Women and Minorities in Management[J]. American Psychologist, 1990, 45 (2): 200-208.
[15]Northcraft,G. B. and B. A. Gutek. Point-counterpoint: Discrimination against Women-Going, Going, Gone or Going but Never Gone? [A]. In E. A. Fagenson (Ed.). Women in Management: Trends, Issues and Challenges in Managerial Diversity[C]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993: 219-245.
[16]杨海秀等. 广西高校不同学位女教师发展现状分析[J]. 经济与社会发展, 2005, 3 (9).
[17]谢慧盈. 高校女教师低职业成就的文化原因探悉[J]. 海南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 21 (3).
[18]谭瑾. 高校和谐校园建设亟需提高女教师的成就意识[J]. 长春理工大学学报（高教版）, 2008, 3 (4).
[19]Dreeben, R.. The Nature of Teaching[M]. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1970.
[20]Lortie, D. C.. School Teacher: A Sociological Study[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1975.
[21]万琼华. 传统性别分工的现实存在与高校女教师的应对[J]. 辽宁教育行政学院学报, 2004, 21 (3).
[22]柳洪琼. 论高校女教师性别意识与素质培养[J].安徽教育学院学报, 2001, 19 (1).
[21]柳洪琼. 论高校女教师性别意识与素质培养[J].安徽教育学院学报, 2001, (1).
[23]曹爱华、李捷. 对高校女教师角色冲突的理性认识[J]. 天津市教科院学报, 2006, (3).
[24]潘慧玲. 踏寻研究中女教师生涯的影貌[J/OL]. 性别、心理及文化——本土女性主义的开展科际学术研讨会论文, 2001,http://web.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/~panhu/searchteacher.pdf.
[25]吴郑重. 厨房之舞：身体和空间的日常生活地理学考察[M]. 台北：联经出版事业股份有限公司, 2010.
[26]何建华. 国外女性职业生涯开发研究现状综述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2006, 28 (1).
[27]陈斐娟,徐凤翎. 梦想起飞——女性主管职涯规划[J]. （台湾）研习论坛月刊, 2007, 76 (4).
[28]Fassinger, R. E.. Causal Models of Career Choice in Two Samples of College Women[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1990, 36 (2): 225-248.
[29]禹旭才. 高校女教师的发展困境：社会性别视角的审视[J]. 大学教育科学,2012, 5 (5).
[30]高伟云,石美琦,王亚佩.高校女教师素质的影响因素及其提升对策[J].宁波教育学院学报,2004, 6 (4).
[31]程芳. 高校女教师职业发展状况、障碍因素及发展策略[J]. 教育探索,2010,(11).
[32]Longre J. F. and MeLeod E.. Consciousness Raising and Social Work Practices[J]. Social Casework, 1980, 61 (5): 267-276.
[33]Gilligan, C.. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
[34]倪伟、方红. 试论道德的关爱取向与公正取向[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), 2008, 3 (2).
[35]Noddings, N.. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethic and Moral Education[M]. Berkely, CA: University of California Press, 2003.
[36]Noddings, N.. The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education[M]. New York: Teachers College Press, 2005.
[37]Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Golderberg, N., & J. Tarule. Knowledge, Difference and Power: Essay's Inspired by "Women's Ways of Knowing"[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1996.
[38]Rosener, J. B.. Ways Women Lead[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, Nov-Dec: 119-125.
[39]许纪霖. 都市空间视野中的知识分子研究[J]. 天津社会科学, 2004, (3).
[40]Young, I. M.. On Female Body Experience: "Throwing Like a Girl" and Other Essays[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[41][美]朱迪斯·巴特勒著,宋素凤译. 性别麻烦：女性主义与身份的颠覆[M]. 上海：上海三联书店, 2009.
[42]徐安琪,张亮,刘汶蓉. 家庭:和谐社会建设中的功能变迁和政策支持[J].社会科学, 2006, (4).
[43]Pun, Ng.. Made in China: Women Factory Workers in a Global Workplace[M]. Durham: London: Duke University Press, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2005.
[44]Ding, Y. and P. S. Y. Ho.. Sex Work in China’s Pearl River Delta: Accumulating Sexual Capital as a Life Advancement Strategy[J]. Sexualities, 2013, 16 (3-4): 43-60.
[45]Shields, R.. Henri Lefebvre: Introduction[J/OL]. 2010.
[46]Lefebvre, H., trans. Moore, J.. Critique of Everyday Life. Volume II: Foundations for a Sociology of the Everyday[M]. London: Verso, 2002.
[47]de Certeau, M. trans. Rendall, S. F.. The Practice of Everyday Life[M]. Berkeley: Los Angeles: London: University of California Press, 1984.
[48]郑震. 列斐伏尔日常生活批判理论的社会学意义——迈向一种日常生活的社会学[J]. 社会学研究, 2011, (3).
[49]Smith, D. E.. Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling[M]. London; New York: Routledge, 1990.
[50]Harding, S.. Feminism, Science, and the Anti-enlightenment Critiques[A]. In Garry, A. and Pearsall, M. (Eds.). Women, Knowledge and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy[M]. 2nd Edition. New York: London: Routledge, 1996: 298-320.
[51]Smith, D. E.. Institutional Ethnography-Towards a Productive Sociology-An Interview with Dorothy E. Smith[EB/OL]. by Widerberg, K. Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo. 2004. http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/sv/iss/SOS4000/v06/ forelesningsnotater/Karin%20Widerberg%20intervju%20med%20Dorothy%20Smith.doc.
[52]Smith, D. E.. Knowing a Society from within: A Woman's Standpoint[EB/OL]. 1974. http://www.culturalstudies.net/woman.html.
[53]Smith, D. E.. Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations[M]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.
[54]Smith, D. E.. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology[M]. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, 1987.
[55]Peritore, N. P.. Some Problems in Alfred Schutz's Phenomenological Methodology[J]. The American Political Science Review, 1975, 69 (1): 132-140.

[1]	. [J]. , 2022, 0(5): 97-.