Abstract:The present paper teases out the transformation of female identity knowledge/discourse since the Enlightenment. From the unified and stable subject advocated by early liberal feminists in the late 18th century to the heterogeneous multiple identity in the 21st century, female identity knowledge/discourse has witnessed significant rupture, transformation, continuation and renewal. The present study on female identity knowledge/discourse indicates the transformation of female identity from sameness to difference and its tendency of further differentiation and multiplicity in the future.
陈李萍. 从同一到差异——女性身份认同理论话语的三重嬗变?[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2012, 0(6): 8-14.
CHEN Li-ping. From Sameness to Difference: On the Transformation of Female Identity, Knowledge and Discourse. , 2012, 0(6): 8-14.
[1]张岂之.中华人文精神[M].西安:西北大学出版社,1997. [2]Stuart Hall. The Question of Cultural Identity[A]. Modernity and its Future[C]. eds. Stuart Hall, David Held and Anthony Mcgrew. London: Open University Press, 1992. [3]Mary Wollstonecroft. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman[M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2003. [4]Barbara Caine. English Feminism: 1780-1980[M]. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1997. [5]Margaret Walters,朱刚,麻晓蓉译.女权主义简史[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2008. [6]Simon de Beauvior. The Second Sex[M]. Trans. H. M. Parshley. London: Vintage, 1997. [7]Toril Moi. Sex, Gender and the Body[M].New York: Oxford UP, 2005. [8]Judith Butler. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity[M]. New York and London: Routledge, 1999. [9]Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other Woman[M]. Trans. Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985. [10]陈李萍.波伏娃之后——当代女性批评理论中的女性主体性批判[J].宁夏社会科学,2011,(1). [11]Luce Irigaray. This Sex Which Is Not One[M]. trans. Catherine Porter and Carolyn Burke. Ithaca and New York: Cornell UP, 1977. [12]Ann Brooks. Postfeminisms: Feminism, Cultural Theory and Cultural Forms[M]. London and New York: Routledge, 1997. [13]Susan Stanford Friedman. "Beyond" Genocriticism and Gynesis: The Geographics of Identity and the Future of Feminist Criticism[J]. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 1996, 15(1).